Data from Investigating Variation in Replicability: A “Many Labs” Replication Project
This is the data paper accompanying the first Many Labs project, publishing the dataset from Klein, Ratliff, Vianello and colleagues' replication of thirteen classic and contemporary psychological effects across 36 independent samples and 6,344 participants. No abstract for the data paper itself could be retrieved from OpenAlex, Crossref or Semantic Scholar, and this publication has not read it, so nothing is claimed here beyond what its title states and what the companion article reports. The value of an entry like this is that the data behind a large replication project were published openly, which is the practice the whole replication literature has been arguing for. For the findings, see the companion article: ten of the thirteen effects replicated consistently, one weakly, and two, both priming effects, did not.
This is the data paper accompanying the first Many Labs project, publishing the dataset from Klein, Ratliff, Vianello and colleagues' replication of thirteen classic and contemporary psychological effects across 36 independent samples and 6,344 participants. No abstract for the data paper itself could be retrieved from OpenAlex, Crossref or Semantic Scholar, and this publication has not read it, so nothing is claimed here beyond what its title states and what the companion article reports. The value of an entry like this is that the data behind a large replication project were published openly, which is the practice the whole replication literature has been arguing for. For the findings, see the companion article: ten of the thirteen effects replicated consistently, one weakly, and two, both priming effects, did not.
Written from the public record for the data paper.
What our sources record
Reproduced as it was written when this source was checked, figures and all.
Klein, R. A., et al. (2014). "Investigating Variation in Replicability: A 'Many Labs' Replication Project." Social Psychology, 45(3), 142-152. 36 samples, 6,344 participants. Original d = 0.23, 95% CI [.04, .50]; median replication d = 0.32; unweighted d = 0.31, 99% CI [.22, .39]; weighted d = 0.27, 99% CI [.20, .34]; aggregate t = 10.83, N = 6,330, p < .001; Q = 35.55, df = 35, p = .206. Full text read 2026-09-02. The item is Oppenheimer, Meyvis & Davidenko's (2009) football-ticket vignette, adapted from Thaler (1985), not Arkes and Blumer's theatre study.
Where we use it
- Why You Finish the Series You Stopped Enjoying, Why We Act
Reliability of this reference
The link below is the right work, with one detail that does not line up. Crossref lists the first author as '', the citation begins 'klein'. Worth opening before quoting a figure from it.
The source
https://doi.org/10.5334/jopd.ad
DOI: 10.5334/jopd.ad