Defending humankind: anthropocentric bias in the appreciation of AI art

Millet (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · Read the paper

Four experiments, 1,708 participants; AI-labelled art rated less creative and less awe-inducing; stronger among people holding anthropocentric views of creativity.

Four experiments, 1,708 participants; AI-labelled art rated less creative and less awe-inducing; stronger among people holding anthropocentric views of creativity.

Written from the abstract read 2026-10-13.

What our sources record

Reproduced as it was written when this source was checked, figures and all.

143, 107707. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107707. Abstract read (VU Amsterdam research portal): four experiments, 1,708 participants; AI-labelled art rated less creative and less awe-inducing; stronger among people holding anthropocentric views of creativity.