Validity and Reliability of the Experience-Sampling Method
[NOT READ; the bibliographic record was confirmed and no finding is attributed to it] Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). 'Validity and Reliability of the Experience-Sampling Method.' The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 526-536. the method's validity statement. Provenance of the method is clean and credit properly shared: first publication Csikszentmihalyi, Larson and Prescott 1977; methods statement Larson and Csikszentmihalyi 1983. The limitations recorded in the method's own literature, none conceded in Flow: self-report ceiling, selection bias towards compliant volunteers, incomplete signal compliance with the misses plausibly concentrated in the deepest absorption, reactivity, and the one specific to this construct, that the signal is an interruption and the construct is uninterrupted absorption.
[NOT READ; the bibliographic record was confirmed and no finding is attributed to it] Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). 'Validity and Reliability of the Experience-Sampling Method.' The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 526-536. the method's validity statement. Provenance of the method is clean and credit properly shared: first publication Csikszentmihalyi, Larson and Prescott 1977; methods statement Larson and Csikszentmihalyi 1983. The limitations recorded in the method's own literature, none conceded in Flow: self-report ceiling, selection bias towards compliant volunteers, incomplete signal compliance with the misses plausibly concentrated in the deepest absorption, reactivity, and the one specific to this construct, that the signal is an interruption and the construct is uninterrupted absorption.
Written from the nOT READ; the bibliographic record was confirmed and no finding is attributed to it.
What our sources record
Recorded when this source was checked, figures included, with page references and quotation marks removed.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and Reliability of the Experience-Sampling Method. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 526-536.