Extrinsic Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation in Education: Reconsidered Once Again
Deci, Koestner and Ryan answered the Cameron and Pierce analysis by splitting performance-contingent rewards four ways, by type of control group and feedback valence. They describe the group that resembles typical real-world schemes, where not everyone receives the maximum reward, as producing the largest undermining effect of any category in the entire meta-analysis.
Deci, Koestner and Ryan answered the Cameron and Pierce analysis by splitting performance-contingent rewards four ways, by type of control group and feedback valence. They describe the group that resembles typical real-world schemes, where not everyone receives the maximum reward, as producing the largest undermining effect of any category in the entire meta-analysis.
Written from the full text read at source for the vault hub; poor OCR, figures cross-checked against the 1999 paper.
What our sources record
Recorded when this source was checked, figures included, with page references and quotation marks removed.
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Extrinsic Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation in Education: Reconsidered Once Again. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 1-27.