True believers: The incredulity hypothesis and the enduring legacy of the obedience experiments
Doris, Niemi and Machery, Philosophia Scientiae 28(2), 2024, 53-89. Examines the incredulity hypothesis and argues it is not generally applicable: it does not easily explain behaviour in the original experiments and replications and fits poorly with participants' own accounts.
Doris, Niemi and Machery, Philosophia Scientiae 28(2), 2024, 53-89. Examines the incredulity hypothesis and argues it is not generally applicable: it does not easily explain behaviour in the original experiments and replications and fits poorly with participants' own accounts.
Written from the abstract summary.
What our sources record
Recorded when this source was checked, figures included, with page references and quotation marks removed.
Doris, J. M., Niemi, L., & Machery, E. (2024). True believers: The incredulity hypothesis and the enduring legacy of the obedience experiments. Philosophia Scientiae, 28(2), 53-89. doi:10.4000/11pu1 https://doi.org/10.4000/11pu1