Good-looking people are not what we think
Feingold's meta-analysis covers two bodies of research. In experimental studies of the physical attractiveness stereotype, attractive people were rated as more sociable, dominant, intelligent and socially skilled than unattractive people. In correlational studies, attractiveness was generally only trivially related to personality and mental ability, although attractive people were more popular and more socially skilled. People's own ratings of their attractiveness went with a wider range of attributes than their measured attractiveness did.
Feingold's meta-analysis covers two bodies of research. In experimental studies of the physical attractiveness stereotype, attractive people were rated as more sociable, dominant, intelligent and socially skilled than unattractive people. In correlational studies, attractiveness was generally only trivially related to personality and mental ability, although attractive people were more popular and more socially skilled. People's own ratings of their attractiveness went with a wider range of attributes than their measured attractiveness did.
Written from the abstract, library record, DOI matched on Crossref, 2026-11-03.
What our sources record
Recorded when this source was checked, figures included, with page references and quotation marks removed.
Feingold, A. (1992). Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 304-341. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.304 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.304