English Translation and Validation of the Ikigai-9 in a UK Sample
[NOT READ. The Springer version is paywalled and the publisher has ELIDED THE ABSTRACT at Semantic Scholar; the CC-BY republication in the Journal of Concurrent Disorders was not reached either] Fido, D., Kotera, Y., & Asano, K. (2019). 'English Translation and Validation of the Ikigai-9 in a UK Sample.' International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 18(5), 1352-1359. doi:10.1007/s11469-019-00150-w. A CC-BY republication exists in the Journal of Concurrent Disorders, 2(2), 2020, doi:10.54127/ltvz7010. Author order confirmed at api.openalex.org: Fido first, University of Derby Online Learning; Kotera second, Derby; Asano third, Department of Psychological Counseling, Mejiro University, Tokyo. CITABLE FOR ITS EXISTENCE, VENUE AND AUTHOR ORDER ONLY. RELEVANCE: the Ikigai-9 is the multi-item instrument the research field actually uses, and it has nothing to do with the four circles of the popular diagram. HONESTY FLAG AND WITHHELD FIGURE: a search summary reports that confirmatory factor analysis in the UK sample did not support the original three-factor structure and favoured a single-factor solution, and that French and Turkish validations report differently. THAT FINDING IS SECOND HAND, IS NOT STATED AS READ, AND NO FACTOR-ANALYSIS RESULT FROM THIS PAPER MAY APPEAR IN ANY ARTICLE OR PAGE ON THE STRENGTH OF IT. The most that may be written without a citation is that the instrument's factor structure has not travelled identically into English.
[NOT READ. The Springer version is paywalled and the publisher has ELIDED THE ABSTRACT at Semantic Scholar; the CC-BY republication in the Journal of Concurrent Disorders was not reached either] Fido, D., Kotera, Y., & Asano, K. (2019). 'English Translation and Validation of the Ikigai-9 in a UK Sample.' International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 18(5), 1352-1359. doi:10.1007/s11469-019-00150-w. A CC-BY republication exists in the Journal of Concurrent Disorders, 2(2), 2020, doi:10.54127/ltvz7010. Author order confirmed at api.openalex.org: Fido first, University of Derby Online Learning; Kotera second, Derby; Asano third, Department of Psychological Counseling, Mejiro University, Tokyo. CITABLE FOR ITS EXISTENCE, VENUE AND AUTHOR ORDER ONLY. RELEVANCE: the Ikigai-9 is the multi-item instrument the research field actually uses, and it has nothing to do with the four circles of the popular diagram. HONESTY FLAG AND WITHHELD FIGURE: a search summary reports that confirmatory factor analysis in the UK sample did not support the original three-factor structure and favoured a single-factor solution, and that French and Turkish validations report differently. THAT FINDING IS SECOND HAND, IS NOT STATED AS READ, AND NO FACTOR-ANALYSIS RESULT FROM THIS PAPER MAY APPEAR IN ANY ARTICLE OR PAGE ON THE STRENGTH OF IT. The most that may be written without a citation is that the instrument's factor structure has not travelled identically into English.
Written from the nOT READ. The Springer version is paywalled and the publisher has ELIDED THE ABSTRACT at Semantic Scholar; the CC-BY republication in the Journal of Concurrent Disorders was not reached either.
What our sources record
Recorded when this source was checked, figures included, with page references and quotation marks removed.
Fido, D., Kotera, Y., & Asano, K. (2019). English Translation and Validation of the Ikigai-9 in a UK Sample. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 18(5), 1352-1359. doi:10.1007/s11469-019-00150-w