Haridon, O., & Paraschiv, C.
elicits individuals' and couples' preferences under prospect theory using certainty equivalents. Couples' risk attitudes were compatible with prospect theory and showed deviations from expected utility similar to those found in individual decision making, and couples' attitudes were consistent with a mix of the two individual attitudes, with women more influential at low probability levels. Author order confirmed at the Crossref item record: Abdellaoui first, l'Haridon second, Paraschiv third. CORRECTION THE ARTICLE MUST CARRY: the circulating claim that couples discount the future less, meaning joint decisions reduce impatience, appears in the authors' 2010 and 2011 HEC Paris working paper,
elicits individuals' and couples' preferences under prospect theory using certainty equivalents. Couples' risk attitudes were compatible with prospect theory and showed deviations from expected utility similar to those found in individual decision making, and couples' attitudes were consistent with a mix of the two individual attitudes, with women more influential at low probability levels. Author order confirmed at the Crossref item record: Abdellaoui first, l'Haridon second, Paraschiv third. CORRECTION THE ARTICLE MUST CARRY: the circulating claim that couples discount the future less, meaning joint decisions reduce impatience, appears in the authors' 2010 and 2011 HEC Paris working paper,
Written from the full text read 2026-10-18.
What our sources record
Recorded when this source was checked, figures included, with page references and quotation marks removed.
(2013). Individual vs. couple behavior: an experimental investigation of risk preferences. Theory and Decision, 75(2), 175-191. doi:10.1007/s11238-012-9322-7.