The affection effect in insurance decisions

Hsee (2000) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · Read the paper

Hsee and Kunreuther, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 20(2), 2000, 141-159. Attachment to an item raised willingness to insure it at an unchanged payout and made people more likely to file a claim for a fixed payout after damage. Standard theories do not predict either pattern. Authors propose a consolation hypothesis: compensation is comfort for loss, not only money.

Hsee and Kunreuther, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 20(2), 2000, 141-159. Attachment to an item raised willingness to insure it at an unchanged payout and made people more likely to file a claim for a fixed payout after damage. Standard theories do not predict either pattern. Authors propose a consolation hypothesis: compensation is comfort for loss, not only money.

Written from the abstract (RePEc), 2026-11-10.

What our sources record

Recorded when this source was checked, figures included, with page references and quotation marks removed.

Hsee, C. K., & Kunreuther, H. C. (2000). The affection effect in insurance decisions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 20(2), 141-159. doi:10.1023/A:1007876907268 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007876907268