Neural correlates of cognitive dissonance and choice-induced preference change

Izuma (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · Read the paper

Izuma first author. Using a rate-rate-choose control condition and two measures of preference, self-report and striatum activity, the study addressed the methodological problem raised about the whole free-choice literature. Making a choice changed both the reported preference and its neural representation, with anterior cingulate and dorsolateral prefrontal activity tracking the degree of dissonance. A later review records that the effect is significant only one-tailed, and no sample size is given.

Izuma first author. Using a rate-rate-choose control condition and two measures of preference, self-report and striatum activity, the study addressed the methodological problem raised about the whole free-choice literature. Making a choice changed both the reported preference and its neural representation, with anterior cingulate and dorsolateral prefrontal activity tracking the degree of dissonance. A later review records that the effect is significant only one-tailed, and no sample size is given.

Written from the abstract read 2026-10-18.

What our sources record

Recorded when this source was checked, figures included, with page references and quotation marks removed.

Izuma, K., Matsumoto, M., Murayama, K., Samejima, K., Sadato, N., & Matsumoto, K. (2010). Neural correlates of cognitive dissonance and choice-induced preference change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(51), 22014-22019. doi:10.1073/pnas.1011879108.