Hyperdopaminergic Mutant Mice Have Higher “Wanting” But Not “Liking” for Sweet Rewards

Peciña (2003) · Read the paper

Pecina, Cagniard, Berridge, Aldridge and Zhuang used a genetic mutant approach to ask what dopamine does in natural reward. A dopamine transporter knockdown mutation preserving only a tenth of normal transporter, and therefore leaving mutant mice with roughly seventy per cent elevated synaptic dopamine, was used to separate incentive motivation from hedonic impact. The hyperdopaminergic mice ate and drank more, learned a runway task for a sweet reward faster, left the start box more quickly, paused less, resisted distraction better and proceeded more directly to the goal, all of which indicates greater incentive salience attributed to the reward. In an affective taste reactivity test, the taste of sucrose did not elicit higher orofacial liking reactions from the same animals. The authors conclude that chronically elevated extracellular dopamine facilitates wanting and incentive learning without increasing liking for the hedonic impact of sweet tastes. This is the demonstration behind the distinction.

Pecina, Cagniard, Berridge, Aldridge and Zhuang used a genetic mutant approach to ask what dopamine does in natural reward. A dopamine transporter knockdown mutation preserving only a tenth of normal transporter, and therefore leaving mutant mice with roughly seventy per cent elevated synaptic dopamine, was used to separate incentive motivation from hedonic impact. The hyperdopaminergic mice ate and drank more, learned a runway task for a sweet reward faster, left the start box more quickly, paused less, resisted distraction better and proceeded more directly to the goal, all of which indicates greater incentive salience attributed to the reward. In an affective taste reactivity test, the taste of sucrose did not elicit higher orofacial liking reactions from the same animals. The authors conclude that chronically elevated extracellular dopamine facilitates wanting and incentive learning without increasing liking for the hedonic impact of sweet tastes. This is the demonstration behind the distinction.

Written from the abstract, OpenAlex.

What our sources record

Reproduced as it was written when this source was checked, figures and all.

Peciña, S., Cagniard, B., Berridge, K. C., Aldridge, J. W., & Zhuang, X. (2003). 'Hyperdopaminergic mutant mice have higher wanting but not liking for sweet rewards.' Journal of Neuroscience, 23(28), 9395-9402. Dopamine transporter knockdown mice with roughly seventy per cent elevated synaptic dopamine showed raised incentive motivation for a sweet reward without raised affective liking reactions to its taste. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-28-09395.2003

Where we use it

  • Why a Song Gives You Chills, Why We Engage

Reliability of this reference

The link below was matched against the publisher's record on title, first author and year, and all three agree.

The source

https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.23-28-09395.2003

DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.23-28-09395.2003