Credibility and incredulity in Milgram's obedience experiments: A reanalysis of an unpublished test
Perry, Brannigan, Wanner and Stam, Social Psychology Quarterly 83(1), published online 2019, 88-106. Reanalysis of an unpublished test by Milgram's assistant: in 18 of 23 variations, participants who fully believed they were causing pain chose lower shock levels; the authors discuss implications for the classical interpretation.
Perry, Brannigan, Wanner and Stam, Social Psychology Quarterly 83(1), published online 2019, 88-106. Reanalysis of an unpublished test by Milgram's assistant: in 18 of 23 variations, participants who fully believed they were causing pain chose lower shock levels; the authors discuss implications for the classical interpretation.
Written from the abstract summary.
What our sources record
Recorded when this source was checked, figures included, with page references and quotation marks removed.
Perry, G., Brannigan, A., Wanner, R. A., & Stam, H. J. (2019). Credibility and incredulity in Milgram's obedience experiments: A reanalysis of an unpublished test. Social Psychology Quarterly, 83(1), 88-106. doi:10.1177/0190272519861952 https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272519861952