The Utility of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
a validity review on Messick's unified view, concluding that the evidence does not support the test's tenets or the claims made about its utility NO RETEST PERCENTAGE appears in the abstract, although the widely circulated 39 to 76 per cent and 50 per cent figures are attributed to this paper and to Pittenger 2005 across the web
a validity review on Messick's unified view, concluding that the evidence does not support the test's tenets or the claims made about its utility NO RETEST PERCENTAGE appears in the abstract, although the widely circulated 39 to 76 per cent and 50 per cent figures are attributed to this paper and to Pittenger 2005 across the web
Written from the abstract read 2026-10-18.
What our sources record
Recorded when this source was checked, figures included, with page references and quotation marks removed.
Pittenger, D. J. (1993). The Utility of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Review of Educational Research, 63(4), 467-488. doi:10.2307/1170497.