When replication fails: What to conclude and not to conclude? Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 7(4). doi:10.1177/25152459241268197 https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459241268197
Sleegers, van Leeuwen, Ross and colleagues, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 7(4), 2024. Commentary responding to other commentaries on the multilab replication; discusses possible reasons for the null result including the perceived-choice manipulation and reviews methodological issues in the wider literature such as sample sizes and open-science practice.
Sleegers, van Leeuwen, Ross and colleagues, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 7(4), 2024. Commentary responding to other commentaries on the multilab replication; discusses possible reasons for the null result including the perceived-choice manipulation and reviews methodological issues in the wider literature such as sample sizes and open-science practice.
Written from the abstract.
What our sources record
Recorded when this source was checked, figures included, with page references and quotation marks removed.
Sleegers, W. W. A., van Leeuwen, F., Ross, R. M., et al. (2024). When replication fails: What to conclude and not to conclude? Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 7(4). doi:10.1177/25152459241268197 https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459241268197