Strategies for revising judgment: How (and how well) people use others
[abstract only; full text not retrieved, 2026-10-19] Soll, J. B., & Larrick, R. P. (2009). 'Strategies for revising judgment: How (and how well) people use others' opinions.' Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(3), 780-805. doi:10.1037/a0015145. Author order confirmed at the OpenAlex item record: Soll first, Larrick second, both at the Fuqua School of Business, Duke University. The paper identifies two strategies people use when revising a numerical estimate after seeing another person's: choosing between the two estimates, or averaging them. It builds a probability, accuracy, redundancy model to compare them and reports that averaging was the more effecti
[abstract only; full text not retrieved, 2026-10-19] Soll, J. B., & Larrick, R. P. (2009). 'Strategies for revising judgment: How (and how well) people use others' opinions.' Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(3), 780-805. doi:10.1037/a0015145. Author order confirmed at the OpenAlex item record: Soll first, Larrick second, both at the Fuqua School of Business, Duke University. The paper identifies two strategies people use when revising a numerical estimate after seeing another person's: choosing between the two estimates, or averaging them. It builds a probability, accuracy, redundancy model to compare them and reports that averaging was the more effecti
Written from the abstract only; full text not retrieved, 2026-10-19.
What our sources record
Recorded when this source was checked, figures included, with page references and quotation marks removed.
opinions.' Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(3), 780-805. doi:10.1037/a0015145.