The neglected 95% revisited: Is American psychology becoming less American?
[ABSTRACT AND PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT READ IN FULL at the Clark Digital Commons record, which prints both entire; full text not retrieved] Thalmayer, A. G., Toscanelli, C., & Arnett, J. J. (2021). 'The neglected 95% revisited: Is American psychology becoming less American?' American Psychologist, 76(1), 116-129. doi:10.1037/amp0000622. THIS IS THE ANSWER TO 'HAS IT IMPROVED' AND IT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT SOURCE IN THE FILE AFTER THE 2010 PAPER. In their words: Arnett 2008 showed the most prominent journals in six subdisciplines 'focused almost exclusively (over 70% of samples and authors) on a cultural context, the United States, shared by only 5% of the world's population'; 'Ten years later, an analysis of the same 6 journals for the period of 2014 to 2018 indicates that the authors and samples are now on average a little over 60% American based'; 'The change is mainly due to an increase in authorship and samples from other English-speaking and Western European countries'; 'Thus, it might be said that 11% of the world's population is now represented in these top psychology journals, but that 89% of the world's population continues to be neglected. Majority world authors and samples (4-5%) are still sorely lacking from the evidence base'; and 'Psychology still has a long way to go to become a science truly representative of human beings.' NOTE THE DISCREPANCY AND DO NOT BLEND IT: Arnett's own later description of his 2008 count is 'over 70% of samples and authors' American, where the 2010 paper reports him at 68 per cent of subjects. The vault has read neither against the original, so each figure must be attributed to its own source.
[ABSTRACT AND PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT READ IN FULL at the Clark Digital Commons record, which prints both entire; full text not retrieved] Thalmayer, A. G., Toscanelli, C., & Arnett, J. J. (2021). 'The neglected 95% revisited: Is American psychology becoming less American?' American Psychologist, 76(1), 116-129. doi:10.1037/amp0000622. THIS IS THE ANSWER TO 'HAS IT IMPROVED' AND IT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT SOURCE IN THE FILE AFTER THE 2010 PAPER. In their words: Arnett 2008 showed the most prominent journals in six subdisciplines 'focused almost exclusively (over 70% of samples and authors) on a cultural context, the United States, shared by only 5% of the world's population'; 'Ten years later, an analysis of the same 6 journals for the period of 2014 to 2018 indicates that the authors and samples are now on average a little over 60% American based'; 'The change is mainly due to an increase in authorship and samples from other English-speaking and Western European countries'; 'Thus, it might be said that 11% of the world's population is now represented in these top psychology journals, but that 89% of the world's population continues to be neglected. Majority world authors and samples (4-5%) are still sorely lacking from the evidence base'; and 'Psychology still has a long way to go to become a science truly representative of human beings.' NOTE THE DISCREPANCY AND DO NOT BLEND IT: Arnett's own later description of his 2008 count is 'over 70% of samples and authors' American, where the 2010 paper reports him at 68 per cent of subjects. The vault has read neither against the original, so each figure must be attributed to its own source.
Written from the aBSTRACT AND PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT READ IN FULL at the Clark Digital Commons record, which prints both entire; full text not retrieved.
What our sources record
Recorded when this source was checked, figures included, with page references and quotation marks removed.
Thalmayer, A. G., Toscanelli, C., & Arnett, J. J. (2021). The neglected 95% revisited: Is American psychology becoming less American? American Psychologist, 76(1), 116-129. doi:10.1037/amp0000622